In a thought-provoking post, Nigerian actor and filmmaker, Ugezu J. Ugezu, raised a critical question that resonates with many citizens.
"Why is it that Nigerian politicians will only start talking sense once they leave office?” he asked.
This query reflects the frustration of a people who often observe a stark contrast in the actions and statements of their leaders once they are no longer in power.
Ugezu’s question digs deep into the political psyche of Nigeria, pointing to a seeming transformation that occurs in public officials.
Once out of office, these politicians suddenly become outspoken critics, highlighting the same issues they were silent about or even contributed to while in power.
But why does this phenomenon occur, and what does it reveal about the political climate in Nigeria?
The Silence of Politicians in Power
While in office, many Nigerian politicians appear restrained in their public communications.
This silence or avoidance of “talking sense” – addressing real issues, calling out corruption, or proposing tangible solutions – is often interpreted as an unwillingness to challenge the status quo.
As public officials, they may feel pressured to align with powerful forces or maintain party loyalty.
Criticizing ongoing problems while in office could expose them to political retaliation or a loss of the privileges they enjoy.
So, rather than take the risk, they keep quiet, allowing the cycle of poor governance to continue.
Another reason for this silence may be due to systemic corruption and self-interest.
Many officials are embedded in a network of benefits, contracts, and favors that directly conflict with the well-being of the people they govern.
Speaking up would not only jeopardize their financial interests but also implicate them in the broader system of corruption.
Thus, it becomes more convenient to remain silent until they are no longer personally invested.
The Transformation After Office
The situation takes a dramatic turn once these politicians leave office.
Suddenly, the same people who were once silent begin to speak up about the issues plaguing Nigeria.
Former officials are quick to highlight corruption, insecurity, and poor governance, as if they were not part of the system that allowed these problems to fester.
But why do they only become vocal once they have left their positions of influence?
One explanation could be that leaving office provides a sense of freedom and detachment.
No longer constrained by the need to appease certain groups or maintain public favor, these former politicians feel they can now “speak the truth.”
Ironically, this freedom to “talk sense” only emerges when they are no longer in a position to make any meaningful changes.
This pattern raises suspicions about their sincerity.
Is this new outspokenness simply a way to remain relevant, a calculated move to win public sympathy, or even a prelude to another run for office?
Whatever the motivation, the sudden transformation often feels disingenuous to the public, who have witnessed their previous silence.
Are Government Offices "Blinding" Politicians?
Ugezu J. Ugezu poses another pressing question: "Is it that we have demons in all the government offices that blind them once they get sworn in?"
While metaphorical, this question suggests a deeper issue within the Nigerian political structure.
It implies that there may be institutional or cultural factors that “blind” officials, making them forget their initial promises and values.
Some argue that the very environment of Nigerian politics – characterized by corruption, nepotism, and an emphasis on personal gain – corrupts even well-meaning individuals.
Once sworn into office, politicians may quickly realize that standing up for change could cost them their position, influence, and financial benefits.
As a result, they become complicit in maintaining the system rather than dismantling it.
Others believe that political positions in Nigeria are rarely assumed with genuine intent to serve.
Instead, many politicians enter office motivated by the promise of wealth and power, seeing public service as a business venture.
Once they achieve these personal gains, they feel no obligation to fight for the people, and any desire to “talk sense” fades away.
The Need for Sincerity in Nigerian Governance
As Ugezu rightly points out, Nigeria is in a mess, and only sincerity in administration can salvage things.
The country grapples with numerous issues – from poverty and unemployment to insecurity and corruption – and solving these problems requires leaders who are truly committed to positive change.
Sincerity in governance means that politicians must be willing to confront these challenges while in office, not just after leaving.
For Nigeria to move forward, it’s essential for citizens to hold leaders accountable during their tenure, not merely listen to their words after they’ve left office.
Politicians must be judged not by their criticisms once they’re out of power, but by their actions and decisions when they had the authority to make a difference.
This requires a change in political culture, where integrity and accountability become fundamental values in leadership.
Voters, too, have a role to play by demanding transparency and pushing for political reforms that will ensure public offices are not just seen as avenues for personal enrichment.
Ugezu J. Ugezu’s words resonate with a broader call for change.
“Why is it that Nigerian politicians will only start talking sense once they leave office?” This question echoes the frustration and disappointment of a population that yearns for genuine leadership.
It challenges Nigerian politicians to break free from the cycle of silence and hypocrisy and address the nation’s problems head-on, while they still hold the power to effect change.
Until this happens, Nigeria will continue to struggle with leaders who only “talk sense” when it’s too late to make a difference.
The real transformation will begin when politicians dare to speak truth to power while they are in office, showing that they truly prioritize the well-being of the people over personal or political gain.
Comments